The Union government launched a
new initiative, Twitter Samvad a few days ago to enable and keep the
government-citizen conversation going. This government’s determination towards
e-governance was evident in ‘Digital India’ initiative - to build
infrastructure, deliver services electronically and spread digital literacy. Even
the previous government and a few state governments enthusiastically took up
e-delivery of certain services and grievance redressal through social media. Of
course, we all should hope that a day would come soon where most people will
have devices to click, know where to click and that the governments would only
be a click away from citizens.
Definitely, this is an ambitious
target and it is a huge transformation from the present. As of now, there is
only around 20-25% internet penetration in the country. This is least of our
problems. The transformation from traditional to digital poses two major
challenges. First, newly built service delivery/grievance systems should only
ease the processes instead of complicating them. Second, the implementing
agencies should be ‘willing to’ and be ‘able to’ deliver electronically.
The both of these are very vital
issues – system and personnel. IRCTC though made ticket booking easy, issues
like server errors, peak hour traffic, tatkal booking made user’s life
difficult. This gave way to many unauthorized agents, fraudsters who took
advantage of the loopholes and looted both the government and the passengers. And,
most of the implementing personnel are still e-illiterates. The systems being
built are beyond their capacity to comprehend. They might be having basic
knowledge, but definitely not problem solving ability.
In addition to these, there are
two more issues that are prominent, rural-urban divide and side lining of
traditional grievance redressal mechanisms. Rural urban divide not just with
respect to infrastructure, e-literacy but the very kind of service delivery and
grievances arising are very different for rural and urban. The recent
initiatives of participatory governance (mygov, twitter samvad) and grievance
redressal mechanisms caters only to that 20-25% who use internet. This too is
required especially as internet users are increasing year on and expected to
reach around 40-50% by 2050.
However, the rural India needs
more customised approach, though technology can still play a major role.
Bangalore electricity board, Police are very active on facebook and twitter to
not only keep people in the loop but also for grievance redressal. Two things
help smoothen grievance redressal process through social media. One, ease of
access in raising the complaint as it is just a click away. Two, doing so in
the presence of many co-users and officials improves transparency and gives strength
to the complaint. Rural areas rate zero on ease of access indicator; and access
to wider audience is also limited to the people around and local officials.
This way, the overall power a village has is lesser compared to its urban
counterpart. Also, the fear of losing access to goods and services takes over
the urge to raise a grievance.
The opportunity and transaction
costs for public participation in governance or in getting their grievances
redressed are higher in rural compared to urban. Opportunity costs include –
daily wages for wage labourers, a day’s work for agriculturists etc.
Transaction costs include – transportation charges for repeated visits to
public authorities, time spent and the fear of losing the delivery itself for
any complaint would invite the wrath of local officials.
To bypass all these,
e-initiatives would have worked to an extent at least in an ideal situation, where
the required infrastructure is available and e-literacy levels are high. That
is not the case though, not only in rural but in most of the urban areas. So,
it would be wiser to work on other forms of improving service delivery and
grievance redressal mechanisms than waiting for ideal e-situations to develop.
A single window grievance centre
for all grievances in every gram panchayat should be a good thing to start
with. The application form should be treated as a complaint-cum-RTI application.
Hence, the complaint should get a reply for the grievance raised within 30 days
like in RTI. This has two advantages. One, many who would not have heard of the
powerful tool called RTI, can take advantage of it easily. Two, government-citizen
interaction improves, time bound redressal is assured and accountability of
public authorities towards people increases.
In many of our states, (and even
Union government’s) legislations for time bound service delivery of goods and
services were enacted. They all have either two or three tier appeal
authorities – at district, state/centre. Even the first appeal and second
appeal be allowed to be given at the GP level at the single window grievance
cell. Only a single format form for all grievances will eliminate all
confusions and let people utilise the opportunity and get services delivered. They
may be given a receipt as in RTI and charged a minimum fee. On the question as
to who should be running the grievance cell can be debated. Nevertheless, it
should be an independent body with very less stakes in the day-to-day
administration.
The process should be as simple
as the one laid down by Supreme Court in case of a PIL. It said a postcard
would suffice. Our huge postal network can come in handy in strengthening the
grievance system. If the locality has sufficient levels of e-literacy or even
otherwise, user friendly interactive kiosks which record the grievances instantly
can be set up.
In this digital era where
everything seems to be easy to be implemented in an e-way through technology,
it is important to strengthen traditional ways of grievance redressal. Though
PM is trying to take utmost use of the radio network and rejuvenate it, it has
been a one-side affair so far. To get more inputs from people, setting up of
community radios may be encouraged, which works the same way as a social media,
(people generated content, shared across a community but specific to a
geographic location) but without internet. This government managed to build a
good narrative around ‘digitizing India’. Similar focus should be given to all
weather grievance redressal at everyone’s doorstep – digital or non-digital.
No comments:
Post a Comment